CHAracterisation MEthodology Ontology

Last uploaded: March 26, 2025
loading ....
Preferred Name

Semiosis

Definitions

Semiosis is intended here as a 4D entity, meaning that is not necessarily intended as a process. This enables users to represent more general state of things without necessarily committing to a process/object classification (which in a 4D framework is subjective, and not ontological) through the persistence perspective (in fact semiotics module is independent from persistence module). For example, in a deduction (semiosis) the yellow tinted skin (index) of a patient is a symptom for liver desease (referent) according to a doctor (interpreter). If the user wants to include a commit towards persistency then the deduction can be either: - an obejct: the deduction is a system (object) and the doctor, skin and patient are object components - a process: where the deduction is a process and the doctor, skin and patient are participants Since in the EMMO the object/process categorisation is relation-driven and object/process are not disjointed, the abovementioned deduction can be seen both as a process or object depending on the relation used by the user to navigate the graph. The class for entities where an interpreter, interpretant, reference and sign relate with each others semiotically. EquivalentTo: FullSemiosis or PartialSemiosis EquivalentTo: Deduction or Declaration or Cognition

ID

https://w3id.org/emmo#EMMO_008fd3b2_4013_451f_8827_52bceab11841

comment

Semiosis is intended here as a 4D entity, meaning that is not necessarily intended as a process. This enables users to represent more general state of things without necessarily committing to a process/object classification (which in a 4D framework is subjective, and not ontological) through the persistence perspective (in fact semiotics module is independent from persistence module). For example, in a deduction (semiosis) the yellow tinted skin (index) of a patient is a symptom for liver desease (referent) according to a doctor (interpreter). If the user wants to include a commit towards persistency then the deduction can be either: - an obejct: the deduction is a system (object) and the doctor, skin and patient are object components - a process: where the deduction is a process and the doctor, skin and patient are participants Since in the EMMO the object/process categorisation is relation-driven and object/process are not disjointed, the abovementioned deduction can be seen both as a process or object depending on the relation used by the user to navigate the graph.

EquivalentTo: FullSemiosis or PartialSemiosis

The class for entities where an interpreter, interpretant, reference and sign relate with each others semiotically.

EquivalentTo: Deduction or Declaration or Cognition

EMMO_8a137e9f_579c_4e28_baca_e8980eb0c3db

EquivalentTo: FullSemiosis or PartialSemiosis

EquivalentTo: Deduction or Declaration or Cognition

EMMO_967080e5_2f42_4eb2_a3a9_c58143e835f9

The class for entities where an interpreter, interpretant, reference and sign relate with each others semiotically.

EMMO_c7b62dd7_063a_4c2a_8504_42f7264ba83f

Semiosis is intended here as a 4D entity, meaning that is not necessarily intended as a process. This enables users to represent more general state of things without necessarily committing to a process/object classification (which in a 4D framework is subjective, and not ontological) through the persistence perspective (in fact semiotics module is independent from persistence module). For example, in a deduction (semiosis) the yellow tinted skin (index) of a patient is a symptom for liver desease (referent) according to a doctor (interpreter). If the user wants to include a commit towards persistency then the deduction can be either: - an obejct: the deduction is a system (object) and the doctor, skin and patient are object components - a process: where the deduction is a process and the doctor, skin and patient are participants Since in the EMMO the object/process categorisation is relation-driven and object/process are not disjointed, the abovementioned deduction can be seen both as a process or object depending on the relation used by the user to navigate the graph.

example

Me looking a cat and saying loud: "Cat!" -> the semiosis process me -> interpreter cat -> object (in Peirce semiotics) the cat perceived by my mind -> interpretant "Cat!" -> sign, the produced sign

prefixIRI

EMMO_008fd3b2_4013_451f_8827_52bceab11841

emmo:EMMO_008fd3b2_4013_451f_8827_52bceab11841

prefLabel

Semiosis

subClassOf

https://w3id.org/emmo#EMMO_8bb6b688_812a_4cb9_b76c_d5a058928719

Delete Subject Author Type Created
No notes to display
Create New Mapping

Portal mappings

Mapping To Ontology Relations Source Type Actions
http://emmo.info/emmo#EMMO_008fd3b2_4013_451f_8827_52bceab11841 https://data.industryportal.enit.fr/ontologies/EMMO LOOM Inter-portal
http://emmo.info/emmo/middle/semiotics#EMMO_008fd3b2_4013_451f_8827_52bceab11841 https://data.industryportal.enit.fr/ontologies/EMMO-MECH-TEST LOOM Inter-portal
loading ....
loading ....
loading ....
loading ....
loading ....