loading...| Preferred Name | 
 Semiosis  | 
| Definitions | 
 Semiosis is intended here as a 4D entity, meaning that is not necessarily intended as a process. This enables users to represent more general state of things without necessarily committing to a process/object classification (which in a 4D framework is subjective, and not ontological) through the persistence perspective (in fact semiotics module is independent from persistence module). For example, in a deduction (semiosis) the yellow tinted skin (index) of a patient is a symptom for liver desease (referent) according to a doctor (interpreter). If the user wants to include a commit towards persistency then the deduction can be either: - an obejct: the deduction is a system (object) and the doctor, skin and patient are object components - a process: where the deduction is a process and the doctor, skin and patient are participants Since in the EMMO the object/process categorisation is relation-driven and object/process are not disjointed, the abovementioned deduction can be seen both as a process or object depending on the relation used by the user to navigate the graph. The class for entities where an interpreter, interpretant, reference and sign relate with each others semiotically. EquivalentTo: FullSemiosis or PartialSemiosis EquivalentTo: Deduction or Declaration or Cognition  | 
| ID | 
 https://w3id.org/emmo#EMMO_008fd3b2_4013_451f_8827_52bceab11841  | 
| comment | 
 Semiosis is intended here as a 4D entity, meaning that is not necessarily intended as a process. This enables users to represent more general state of things without necessarily committing to a process/object classification (which in a 4D framework is subjective, and not ontological) through the persistence perspective (in fact semiotics module is independent from persistence module). For example, in a deduction (semiosis) the yellow tinted skin (index) of a patient is a symptom for liver desease (referent) according to a doctor (interpreter). If the user wants to include a commit towards persistency then the deduction can be either: - an obejct: the deduction is a system (object) and the doctor, skin and patient are object components - a process: where the deduction is a process and the doctor, skin and patient are participants Since in the EMMO the object/process categorisation is relation-driven and object/process are not disjointed, the abovementioned deduction can be seen both as a process or object depending on the relation used by the user to navigate the graph. EquivalentTo: FullSemiosis or PartialSemiosis The class for entities where an interpreter, interpretant, reference and sign relate with each others semiotically. EquivalentTo: Deduction or Declaration or Cognition  | 
| EMMO_8a137e9f_579c_4e28_baca_e8980eb0c3db | 
 EquivalentTo: FullSemiosis or PartialSemiosis EquivalentTo: Deduction or Declaration or Cognition  | 
| EMMO_967080e5_2f42_4eb2_a3a9_c58143e835f9 | 
 The class for entities where an interpreter, interpretant, reference and sign relate with each others semiotically.  | 
| EMMO_c7b62dd7_063a_4c2a_8504_42f7264ba83f | 
 Semiosis is intended here as a 4D entity, meaning that is not necessarily intended as a process. This enables users to represent more general state of things without necessarily committing to a process/object classification (which in a 4D framework is subjective, and not ontological) through the persistence perspective (in fact semiotics module is independent from persistence module). For example, in a deduction (semiosis) the yellow tinted skin (index) of a patient is a symptom for liver desease (referent) according to a doctor (interpreter). If the user wants to include a commit towards persistency then the deduction can be either: - an obejct: the deduction is a system (object) and the doctor, skin and patient are object components - a process: where the deduction is a process and the doctor, skin and patient are participants Since in the EMMO the object/process categorisation is relation-driven and object/process are not disjointed, the abovementioned deduction can be seen both as a process or object depending on the relation used by the user to navigate the graph.  | 
| example | 
 Me looking a cat and saying loud: "Cat!" -> the semiosis process me -> interpreter cat -> object (in Peirce semiotics) the cat perceived by my mind -> interpretant "Cat!" -> sign, the produced sign  | 
| prefixIRI | 
 EMMO_008fd3b2_4013_451f_8827_52bceab11841 emmo:EMMO_008fd3b2_4013_451f_8827_52bceab11841  | 
| prefLabel | 
 Semiosis  | 
| subClassOf | 
 https://w3id.org/emmo#EMMO_8bb6b688_812a_4cb9_b76c_d5a058928719  | 
| Delete | Subject | Author | Type | Created | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No notes to display | 
| Mapping To | Ontology | Relations | Source | Type | Actions | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| http://emmo.info/emmo#EMMO_008fd3b2_4013_451f_8827_52bceab11841 | https://data.industryportal.enit.fr/ontologies/EMMO | LOOM | Inter-portal | ||
| http://emmo.info/emmo/middle/semiotics#EMMO_008fd3b2_4013_451f_8827_52bceab11841 | https://data.industryportal.enit.fr/ontologies/EMMO-MECH-TEST | LOOM | Inter-portal |